The decision intelligence of humans and machines

The event has been rescheduled from July 22 to July 24.

To understand our near-future of artificial intelligence firmly integrated into many levels of social life, a challenge is to understand the differences and similarities between human and AI decision-making. In controlled laboratory settings assessing risk and uncertainty, LLMs demonstrate superhuman efficiency but fundamentally diverge from human behavior through a rigid hyper-rationality and an inability to disengage from obsolete strategies. However, when applied to messy, real-world dilemmas "in the wild," these models pivot to function as highly effective "satisficers". Human subjects consistently prefer this artificial counsel over human peer advice, noting its ability to carefully balance emotional context with logical constraints while actively reducing anxiety and regret. Ultimately, this synthesis shows that while AI can offer near-optimal laboratory performance and therapeutic impact in daily life, they also have a distinct lack of behavioral plasticity that we need to account for in models of the future.