Sexual conflict over floral receptivity? — theory-guided experiments of evolutionary ecology

The theory of evolutionary biology predicts that the interests (in terms of adaptation) of different individuals can conflict with one another. Specifically, mating partners can have different optima in traits such as mating rates, number of mates, number of offspring, and resource allocation to the offspring. Botanists have long recognized that pollination induces floral closure or wilting, which is typically seen as the adaptation of the pollen recipients (i.e., getting rid of costly flowers after achieving their function). However, it is also possible that floral closure or wilting is, at least in part, the outcome of the manipulation by selfish pollen. For example, pollen may secure their paternity by preventing additional pollination. Fewer seed production by the recipients can result in so much allocation of maternal resources to each fertilized egg cell that is maternally maladaptive (but paternally adaptive). Being guided by these theoretical predictions, I have been testing the hypothesis using both Taraxacum dandelions and Arabidopsis. In this talk, I will show our recent (mostly unpublished) results. Although the projects are halfway, results so far generally support the hypothesis. The ideas of related future projects and the philosophy behind the projects may also be discussed.